Chappell Roan, who raced her way to stardom, found the experience difficult.
From rabid fans to vicious hate trains, she fell victim to the same trappings of fame that many celebrities are familiar with. The theory is that without a backbone, something would be barren and easily digestible.
The latest clash over the toxic nature of parasocial relationships between her and her fans has to do with the upcoming presidential election.
In an interview with the Guardian, she said she would not support a presidential candidate because there are problems on both sides.
The swift backlash to her remarks was disappointing. The level of blind loyalty people have to candidates who are actively funding genocide is alarming.
Given the hilarious memes and aggressive mobilization of both sides despite deadly policies, it is morally sound for celebrities to refuse to participate in this insensitive spectacle.
After the uproar, Roan released a statement saying, “Yes, I’m voting for Kamala.”
However, she remained true to her original position. We need to criticize politicians.
After seeing some of the replies to her statement, I’m starting to lose faith in the public’s ability to evaluate political information.
The hero worship of American politicians is also reflected in celebrity culture.
The United States is unique in that political parties rely on celebrity endorsement. It is a complex web of status, influence, and power without transparency.
Lorne’s refusal to be sophisticated in front of the public has consequences.
American celebrity culture is predatory. Fans project what they want their favorite celebrities to be, regardless of who they are.
Whenever Roan strayed from the image they had of her, fans attacked her as if they knew her personally.
Because of this culture, Roan has had to take steps to protect herself, such as limiting her public appearances and commenting on issues she is passionate about.
Although it’s unfair, a predatory culture isn’t going to change anytime soon. It will probably get even worse.
Roan is actively trying to set boundaries between her and her fans. From fewer photos to canceling concerts to prioritizing her mental health, she’s committed to putting herself first.
This kind of backlash from a celebrity can polarize fans, but that’s within her rights.
Ideally, reliance on presidential candidates for social change would be replaced by local efforts to build nondiscriminatory communities and support systems.
These efforts are happening in all parts of the United States and would benefit from as many supporters as possible.
To combat the hopelessness that pervades our society, students must prioritize getting to know their communities on a scale that is less risky.
Local book clubs, library programs, fundraisers, art-based meet-ups, volunteer work, and even taking the initiative to invite friends over for lunch.
The more we rely on our immediate communities, the less we feel the need to get caught up in parasocial relationships with celebrities and politicians.
